Skip to content

[GHSA-7hhj-8fwv-m5hc] A flaw was found in gnutls. A remote attacker could... - #10864

Open
benjaminandrew386-boop wants to merge 1 commit into
benjaminandrew386-boop/advisory-improvement-10864from
benjaminandrew386-boop-GHSA-7hhj-8fwv-m5hc
Open

benjaminandrew386-boop wants to merge 1 commit into
benjaminandrew386-boop/advisory-improvement-10864from
benjaminandrew386-boop-GHSA-7hhj-8fwv-m5hc

Conversation

@benjaminandrew386-boop

Copy link
Copy Markdown

Updates

  • Affected products
  • Summary

Comments
Fix

@github-actions
github-actions Bot changed the base branch from main to benjaminandrew386-boop/advisory-improvement-10864 November 3, 2026 11:43
@benjaminandrew386-boop
benjaminandrew386-boop marked this pull request as draft November 4, 2026 19:32
@benjaminandrew386-boop
benjaminandrew386-boop marked this pull request as ready for review November 4, 2026 19:33
Copilot AI auto review requested due to automatic review settings November 4, 2026 19:33

Copilot AI left a comment

Copy link
Copy Markdown
Contributor

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

🟡 Changes recommended

The advisory incorrectly classifies a GnuTLS flaw as a GitHub Action with an empty package name, preventing consumers from matching it to the affected dependency.

2 open issues
What changed in this PR

Updates the Advisory Database’s unreviewed record for the GnuTLS certificate-validation vulnerability CVE-2026-42012.

Changes:

  • Adds a summary and an affected-package entry.
  • Refreshes the advisory’s modification timestamp.
File Description
advisories/​unreviewed/​2026/​05/​GHSA-7hhj-8fwv-m5hc/​GHSA-7hhj-8fwv-m5hc.json Updates summary, affected-package metadata, and modification time.

Review effort: Max (auto)

Comment on lines +17 to +34
"affected": [
{
"package": {
"ecosystem": "GitHub Actions",
"name": ""
},
"ranges": [
{
"type": "ECOSYSTEM",
"events": [
{
"introduced": "0"
}
]
}
]
}
],
"aliases": [
"CVE-2026-42012"
],
"summary": "Now",
Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment

Labels

None yet

Projects

None yet

Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

2 participants