Repository navigation
fix: an open Spectra change no longer turns the spectra bridge on (#502) - #526
Merged
kiki830621 merged 2 commits intoNov 12, 2026
Merged
Conversation
idd-comment Step 0.7 treated any open Spectra change in the repository as a sign that the call came from spectra-discuss. The signal is removed from the block, from rules/spectra-bridge.md and from the two summaries in the plugin's CLAUDE.md and README; detection no longer runs spectra. New suite spectra-bridge-detect runs the block one signal at a time. Spec change idd-502-open-change-not-a-bridge-signal adds the capability spectra-bridge-detection.
This file contains hidden or bidirectional Unicode text that may be interpreted or compiled differently than what appears below. To review, open the file in an editor that reveals hidden Unicode characters.
Learn more about bidirectional Unicode characters
Sign up for free
to join this conversation on GitHub.
Already have an account?
Sign in to comment
Add this suggestion to a batch that can be applied as a single commit.This suggestion is invalid because no changes were made to the code.Suggestions cannot be applied while the pull request is closed.Suggestions cannot be applied while viewing a subset of changes.Only one suggestion per line can be applied in a batch.Add this suggestion to a batch that can be applied as a single commit.Applying suggestions on deleted lines is not supported.You must change the existing code in this line in order to create a valid suggestion.Outdated suggestions cannot be applied.This suggestion has been applied or marked resolved.Suggestions cannot be applied from pending reviews.Suggestions cannot be applied on multi-line comments.Suggestions cannot be applied while the pull request is queued to merge.Suggestion cannot be applied right now. Please check back later.
Refs #502
Summary
idd-commentStep 0.7 decides whether a call came from a spectra-discuss session; when it says yes, Step 7 writes a bookmark and prints a resume prompt. It said yes whenever the repository had any open Spectra change, whatever the comment was about (reported before as refactor: idd-comment Step 0.7 spectra-bridge over-triggers on unrelated in-flight spectra changes #126). That signal is removed, and the block no longer runsspectra. The other three signals are unchanged:--resume-spectra, a--sourcethat containsspectra-discuss, and a bridge file whoseactive_spectra_sessionis true.rules/spectra-bridge.mdand the two sentences in the plugin's CLAUDE.md and README that list the signals say the same; the two sentences used to say the bridge file only had to exist.spectra-bridge-detectionwith one requirement and two Examples (spec changeidd-502-open-change-not-a-bridge-signal, archived).spectra-bridge-detect: it takes the block out of SKILL.md and runs it one signal at a time with a stand-inspectrathat writes down every call (22 checks).--resume-spectra. Whether to add an automatic path is a question in [enhancement] spectra bridge detection: LOW and INFO findings left by the verify of #502 (follow-up from #502) #525.Verification
Verify gate clean — see the verify report on issue #502. /idd-all merges this PR next if CI and the close-stage guardrails pass.
Checklist
Related
#524, #525
🤖 Generated by /idd-all. Do NOT add a GitHub close trailer (Closes/Fixes/Resolves) — IDD discipline requires /idd-close (run by /idd-all's close stage, or by hand) to enforce the checklist gate + closing summary.