Skip to content

fix: an open Spectra change no longer turns the spectra bridge on (#502) - #526

Merged
kiki830621 merged 2 commits into
mainfrom
idd/502-bug-idd-comment-step-0-7-any-open-spectr
Nov 12, 2026
Merged

kiki830621 merged 2 commits into
mainfrom
idd/502-bug-idd-comment-step-0-7-any-open-spectr

Conversation

@kiki830621

Copy link
Copy Markdown
Member

Refs #502

Summary

Verification

Verify gate clean — see the verify report on issue #502. /idd-all merges this PR next if CI and the close-stage guardrails pass.

Checklist

  • Diagnose ✓
  • Implement (2 commits)
  • Verify — clean
  • No auto-close trailer: /idd-close runs after the merge (idd-all's close stage, or by hand)

Related

#524, #525


🤖 Generated by /idd-all. Do NOT add a GitHub close trailer (Closes/Fixes/Resolves) — IDD discipline requires /idd-close (run by /idd-all's close stage, or by hand) to enforce the checklist gate + closing summary.

idd-comment Step 0.7 treated any open Spectra change in the repository as a sign that the call came from spectra-discuss. The signal is removed from the block, from rules/spectra-bridge.md and from the two summaries in the plugin's CLAUDE.md and README; detection no longer runs spectra. New suite spectra-bridge-detect runs the block one signal at a time. Spec change idd-502-open-change-not-a-bridge-signal adds the capability spectra-bridge-detection.
@kiki830621
kiki830621 merged commit ac42c3a into main Nov 12, 2026
1 check passed
Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment

Labels

None yet

Projects

None yet

Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

1 participant